A pension system fairer and a social pact between workers
Over the past 15 years have seen continuing pension reforms, aimed mainly to cash, now extending the retirement age retirement hours lowering coefficients. However, what has always been missing is the will to give a more equitable pension system. Believe that all workers are equal is clearly a glaring error that does not take account of the abyss of difference in quality of life, expectations and risk of leaving the skin between different jobs.
To realize the actual difference that exists between a builder and an accountant, one need only look at the insurance premiums of life insurance policies and then to the market. All things being equal in age, sex, and pay the cost that a worker has to pay is higher than that of an accountant who holds a sign that the insurance market in mind as the expectations of life are different. Different life expectancy, means having different quality of life in the physical and mental. Think of a limit in the civil service and the place into a private company with fewer than 15 employees (90% of Italian). In the first case guarantee of a job for the entire working life is almost complete in the second would take a crisis to get you into the world of unemployment or at least art.18 and just causes that are optional absent. Furthermore, I challenge to find entrepreneurs who take a sixty to work in his own firm, rather than windows of buildings.
policy from one party should bear the imprint of the reforms, while taking into account the financial aspect, in a more fair by using existing tools like the private insurance market, other workers should create a social contract accept a different pension system that takes into account the real differences work.
Antonio Di Gilio
Adelaide (BA)
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Cover Letter Dental Hygiene
The presumption of innocence of the PD and journalism
newspapers and journalists for too long we have become accustomed to the presumption of guilt and process summaries media-and this not only to political issues and politics, but the news nera.Ultimo aanche events in chronological order that the executive del Pd Bianchini
Tutti ricorderanno chi inizialmente fu accusato per il delitto della Caffarella (un rumeno che nulla centrava) o dell'omicidio di Perugia (Patrick Lumumba)o ancora la croce che per due anni ha dovuto sopportare il padre dei fratellini di Gravina. Tutte persone letteralmente massacrate da giornali e giornalisti che hanno rischiato il linciaggio fisico a causa di un gioralismo becero che ha gareggiato a chi scriveva epiteti più crudeli.
L'uso del condizionale della presunzione è stato sempre sostituito dal modo indicativo di una certezza intrisa di mancanza del rispetto delle più elementari norme deontologiche e democratiche.
Infastidisce come anche lo stesso Pd si sia prodigato alla veloce espulsione del suo dirigente senza that this person has not received a mandate to stop creating a controversy over a matter instrumental immoral.
be clear, if this Gentilini was guilty of the charges pending and justice had occurred, would have to throw away the key. But until justice has not run its course, I have neither moral nor ethical right to utter words of giudizio.E not enough to write titles that use the conditional, then fill the article of nouns like "monster" or "rapist "to be considered immune to problems of conduct.
Trying to sell more copies running behind in sensationalism journalism is the son of a back room that most of the search for truth, peg away at more detail gory as a model of the house of Novi Ligure in the study of the Vespa.
But the Italian people to become violent continuously raped by a communication does not even notice these things.
Antonio Di Gilio
Left and Freedom
Adelaide (BA)
The presumption of innocence is enshrined in Italian Constitution, which states in Article 27, paragraph 2 that "the defendant is not considered guilty until sentencing final. "
Consequences of the presumption of innocence are the established principles, as well as in the Constitution, the Law on fair trial. Howevernewspapers and journalists for too long we have become accustomed to the presumption of guilt and process summaries media-and this not only to political issues and politics, but the news nera.Ultimo aanche events in chronological order that the executive del Pd Bianchini
Tutti ricorderanno chi inizialmente fu accusato per il delitto della Caffarella (un rumeno che nulla centrava) o dell'omicidio di Perugia (Patrick Lumumba)o ancora la croce che per due anni ha dovuto sopportare il padre dei fratellini di Gravina. Tutte persone letteralmente massacrate da giornali e giornalisti che hanno rischiato il linciaggio fisico a causa di un gioralismo becero che ha gareggiato a chi scriveva epiteti più crudeli.
L'uso del condizionale della presunzione è stato sempre sostituito dal modo indicativo di una certezza intrisa di mancanza del rispetto delle più elementari norme deontologiche e democratiche.
Infastidisce come anche lo stesso Pd si sia prodigato alla veloce espulsione del suo dirigente senza that this person has not received a mandate to stop creating a controversy over a matter instrumental immoral.
be clear, if this Gentilini was guilty of the charges pending and justice had occurred, would have to throw away the key. But until justice has not run its course, I have neither moral nor ethical right to utter words of giudizio.E not enough to write titles that use the conditional, then fill the article of nouns like "monster" or "rapist "to be considered immune to problems of conduct.
Trying to sell more copies running behind in sensationalism journalism is the son of a back room that most of the search for truth, peg away at more detail gory as a model of the house of Novi Ligure in the study of the Vespa.
But the Italian people to become violent continuously raped by a communication does not even notice these things.
Antonio Di Gilio
Left and Freedom
Adelaide (BA)
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Car Warranty In Ontario
Who is the union? Virtually none of
This post is to be considered in any way related to the thought of the leftist movement and local freedom, but simply the result of my personal idea.
Recently, I asked who actually represents the sindacato.Troppo often hear on the news that the two sides meet to decide on various issues have to deal with the world of lavoro.Ci would expect that represent at least 50% plus one of the workers in order to be a minimum of one representative realtà.Sono went to investigate the number of players and I made a discovery (which I think many know) nothing short of appalling.
We start from the CGIL.
The data are from 2007 and can be found here
http://www.cgil.it/tesseramento/default.aspx
The data say that Tessari are 5 million 600 thousand, but at a more well-actant 3 pensionati.Sono million are the generation who rightly so by the union has had on the rights and which keeps alive their loyalty.
The second largest group (even if well-spaced) con 400.000 iscritti sono i lavoratori del pubblico impiego a cui si sommano i quasi 100.000 del settore bancario che,scusate se sembrerò crudo, ma è un gruppo di lavoratori che nulla a che vedere dalle angherie che possiamo ritrovare nel settore privato.
Fatti i dovuti calcoli, la CGIL rappresenta circa 2 milioni di lavoratori.
Passiamo alla Cisl(2008)
http://www.cisl.it/Sito-Iscritti.nsf/PagineVarie/Iscritti%5E2008F
I tesserati dichiarati sono 4 milioni e 500 mila iscritti.Ma anche per questo sindacato faciamo un'analisi più attenta.I tesserati ormai non più attivi sono 2 milioni e 200 mila. A questi togliamo un altro mezzo milione di lavoratori tutelati,la Cisl rappresenta circa 1 milione and 800 000 workers. Finally
Uil (2008) The enrolled
http://www.uil.it/organizzazione/iscritti.htm
declared are 2 million 877 thousand and 100 mila.Di These are the retired and the industry pubblico.Conclusione 400 000 the number of workers "in need of protection" is 800,000.
abandoning the other smaller unions that are more bureaucratic structures of some use to the world of lavoro.In Italy there are more than 23 million lavoratori.Tolti 3 million civil servants (including 1 million and a half represented by three more big unions), to about 20 million lavoratori.Di these 4 million 600 thousand are represented by the union (about 18%) the other nisba majority.
In other words, who represents the union? In light of the data are more retirees that workers sign the utility of a time long gone.
are workers who have a full belly (as stated by a union) or are self referential unions representing only themselves that led to these data? And why should they sign their contracts as the representatives of only 18% of workers?
Antonio Di Gilio
This post is to be considered in any way related to the thought of the leftist movement and local freedom, but simply the result of my personal idea.
Recently, I asked who actually represents the sindacato.Troppo often hear on the news that the two sides meet to decide on various issues have to deal with the world of lavoro.Ci would expect that represent at least 50% plus one of the workers in order to be a minimum of one representative realtà.Sono went to investigate the number of players and I made a discovery (which I think many know) nothing short of appalling.
We start from the CGIL.
The data are from 2007 and can be found here
http://www.cgil.it/tesseramento/default.aspx
The data say that Tessari are 5 million 600 thousand, but at a more well-actant 3 pensionati.Sono million are the generation who rightly so by the union has had on the rights and which keeps alive their loyalty.
The second largest group (even if well-spaced) con 400.000 iscritti sono i lavoratori del pubblico impiego a cui si sommano i quasi 100.000 del settore bancario che,scusate se sembrerò crudo, ma è un gruppo di lavoratori che nulla a che vedere dalle angherie che possiamo ritrovare nel settore privato.
Fatti i dovuti calcoli, la CGIL rappresenta circa 2 milioni di lavoratori.
Passiamo alla Cisl(2008)
http://www.cisl.it/Sito-Iscritti.nsf/PagineVarie/Iscritti%5E2008F
I tesserati dichiarati sono 4 milioni e 500 mila iscritti.Ma anche per questo sindacato faciamo un'analisi più attenta.I tesserati ormai non più attivi sono 2 milioni e 200 mila. A questi togliamo un altro mezzo milione di lavoratori tutelati,la Cisl rappresenta circa 1 milione and 800 000 workers. Finally
Uil (2008) The enrolled
http://www.uil.it/organizzazione/iscritti.htm
declared are 2 million 877 thousand and 100 mila.Di These are the retired and the industry pubblico.Conclusione 400 000 the number of workers "in need of protection" is 800,000.
abandoning the other smaller unions that are more bureaucratic structures of some use to the world of lavoro.In Italy there are more than 23 million lavoratori.Tolti 3 million civil servants (including 1 million and a half represented by three more big unions), to about 20 million lavoratori.Di these 4 million 600 thousand are represented by the union (about 18%) the other nisba majority.
In other words, who represents the union? In light of the data are more retirees that workers sign the utility of a time long gone.
are workers who have a full belly (as stated by a union) or are self referential unions representing only themselves that led to these data? And why should they sign their contracts as the representatives of only 18% of workers?
Antonio Di Gilio
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)